In Israel, developments have come at a dangerous time for Mr. Netanyahu, who leads a fragile and fragile coalition government and is on trial for corruption. His promise of annexation, repeated in three elections, had left him in a box after Mr. Kushner opposed his progress, without going through Mr. Trump`s official peace plan. But shortly after Thursday`s agreement, Netanyahu and his internal political rivals announced that they had made progress in coalition talks. Mhm. Just a few moments ago, together with two friends, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Zayed of the United Arab Emirates, I made a very special appeal for them to agree on a historic peace agreement. However, in August-September 2020, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu dealt a blow to the idea of swapping a Palestinian state for an Israeli place in the Middle East community. He has repeatedly stressed that “land for peace” is now an outdated proposition and instead stated that the Israel-UAE agreement constitutes “peace for peace” and “peace by force”.
The Prime Minister says he has made no concessions on the agreement, suspending the annexation at President Trump`s request, rather than serving the agreement with the Emirates. The State of Palestine will not have the right to forge intelligence or security agreements with a state or organization that affect the security of the State of Israel, as defined by the State of Israel. [134] But the agreement triggered an immediate counter-reaction in the region of opposing parts of the ideological spectrum. At least some Israeli settlers and their political allies were disappointed that Mr. Netanyahu abandoned his plan to claim west Bank sovereignty, while the Palestinians felt abandoned by an Arab nation that, even without the threat of annexation, locked them in an unsustainable status quo. Given the shared authority between Hamas in the Gaza Strip and Fatah in the West Bank and a growing number of Palestinians, increasingly frustrated by both, Palestinian leaders are a complex matter. However, at a rare moment of unity and agreement, the two factions (along with a number of fringe political parties) jointly condemned the peace agreement. For Hamas in Gaza, the likely outcome of these recent developments is a short-term escalation of sporadic but ongoing violence that characterizes its border relations with Israel. Israel will probably react on substantive issues. It won`t make much difference. Prospects are more uncertain in the West Bank, where there has been no widespread violence since the second intifada in the early 2000s. To the right.
But to be clear, it was not reported by Mark Landler, an honest journalist, who honors off-balance agreements.